The Daily Mail Don't Half Beat Around the Facial Bush

The Daily Mail published an article last Tuesday. It's titled:

 Kate Winslet reveals her curves in a sheer dress...but what a shame about the powdery face

Winslet's perfectly-raised hair turned heads at the premier

Above is the photo included to substantiate the oh so powdery visage. That is all. I mean that is the main predicament here isn't it? The powdery face?

The powdery face is a shame. But DM, is there really nothing else you want to address to us? No strand of knowledge you wish to impart? No steadily growing worries in your mind, on regarding the impeccable Kate Winslet?

 

No? Oh very well then. 

Do not get me wrong - I adore Kate Winslet, she is talented and fit as. I also agree that every female lets themself go now and then and, as unfortunate as it is, there will always be the celebrity double standards. What I hate is DM's inability to say what they really want to. You do not put up a mega-zoomed picture of a furry countenance (I just hoped to make it sound as cute and elegant as possible) under the pretence of a 'powdery face'. For the love of God, just mention the pretty fluff! 

Here is another example of DM shunning what needs to be expressed:

Actual title: "Propaganda victory for BNP leader Nick Griffin as he fights off contempt of court case over 'racist' constitution"

Intended title: "Nick Griffin is a 'racist' cockmuncher and turd-eater"